178 / On Respecting Islam

Here's a curly one for all you cynics out there (and that includes me): A call to respect Islam, from the pulpit of a Presbyterian church.

That's right, it is a sermon and it's lengthy (you probably should read it on a Sunday morning), but - from the joke at the beginning to the prayer at the end (and the historical contexts in the middle) - pastor John Wimberly makes a case that potentially will blow your mind. Not so much for the content alone (you are used to the subject matter if you are a constant reader), but for the content + where it's coming from. A true Interfaith call to tolerance and peace … and where-ever you come across 'United States' or 'America', just replace it with 'Australia'. Thank you, John.

(re-published with permission and unabridged)



On Respecting Islam

a sermon by John W. Wimberly, Jr.

Pastor, Western Presbyterian Church

March 26, 2006

Text: Matthew 5:1-12

There is a joke that has been around for a long time about someone appearing at the Gate of Heaven. After some pointed questioning to determine the person’s eligibility to enter, St. Peter shows the person in. As Peter gives the new resident a tour of the heavenly grounds, they come upon an odd looking structure. It has high walls and no windows. There is lots of noise coming from the inside.

Seeing the newcomer’s perplexed expression, Peter says, "Let me explain. Those are where the Presbyterians reside. We need to be very quiet as we pass because they think they are the only ones up here."

I think the first time I heard the joke, a priest told it about Roman Catholics. But it works for just about any other religious group. Because one of religion’s greatest sins is our continuing fantasy that we and we alone will inhabit heaven.

Why is it that for us to be right about God, everyone else has to be wrong? Why do Christians think that a God who welcomes back prodigal children, leaves the ninety-nine sheep to purse the lost one will suddenly change personality and no longer want to gather the whole family together? I have never understood a proprietary concept of God’s love and I never will.

But I do know where it comes from. The "my religion is better than your religion" syndrome is yet another example of the most fundamental human sin: hubris. Hubris is what gets us into wars we shouldn’t be in, makes executives at Enron believe they can dupe the world, encourages a Jack Abramoff to engage in ever more bold schemes. Hubris is the driver that shapes much of what is destructive and disgraceful in human behavior.

And hubris clearly infects the lives of institutions as profoundly as it does the lives of individuals. Institutions can be incredibly narcissistic. Rather than serving the people they were created to serve, institutions can demand that we serve them. Chief among the institutions who have fallen victim to the sin of hubris is the church.

Nowhere is our hubris more evident in the church’s teaching that only Christians are saved. Of course, some Christians have taken it to an even higher level. They proclaim that even non-orthodox-thinking Christians are damned.

I have a dear evangelical friend who avoids this judgmental approach in a very simple, humble manner. He says, "I think only Christians are saved but, ultimately, that matter is in God’s hands, not mine." If all the church shared his humble approach to theology, Christians would not have spilled the blood of hundreds of thousands of innocent victims over the years, people ranging from heretics within the church to supposed pagans outside the church.

Mix the state into the religious equation and the church’s hubris rises to the level of the cataclysmic. From the 8th to 15th centuries, Spain was one of history’s great multicultural societies. Judaism, Islam and Christianity thrived in Spain, producing a breathtaking wealth of science, art and humanities. Although they paid a special poll tax, Christians and Jews enjoyed a protected status under Muslim rule in Spain.

However, the era of religious tolerance ended abruptly when, in the 15th century, the Christians gained control of Spain under Isabella and Ferdinand. The country’s 200,000 Jews were expelled almost immediately and the Inquisition killed and tortured many dissenting Christians. Shortly thereafter, the Muslims, who had been guaranteed protection in the Treaty of Granada, were driven from the land they had called home for six hundred years.

While dismantling Spain’s religiously tolerant society, Isabella and Ferdinand sent explorers, troops and priests to the New World. Once there, the Christian Spaniards killed tens of thousands of indigenous people who refused to accept Jesus as their Christ. The conquistadores beamed with pride as they tore down Mayan, Aztec and Incan temples, building churches in their place.

As a warning to ourselves, the example of Spain should be taught in every school in these United States. If we assume that our sublime multi-cultural mix here in the United States is safe, we need only look at Spain.

As we consider immigration legislation, as we consider the headline in yesterday’s Washington Post telling us that within a decade, everyone in this region will be in a minority status, we should be asking, "Who could destroy this great multicultural feast?" Using Spain as the precedent, the answer to the question is: "We can. Americans can destroy our tolerant multiculturalism just as the Spaniards destroyed their multiculturalism." And if it is destroyed, it will probably be done with the same combination of religious intolerance and cultural imperialism we saw at work in Spain.

In the days following 9/11, President Bush wisely and courageously reached out to the Muslim community in the United States. Sensing that some might respond to 9/11 by blaming Muslims, the President visited the Islamic Center on Massachusetts Avenue. It was an unforgettable moment, a truly great leadership gesture.

However, in the years following 9/11, our nation has given Muslims in this nation no reason to feel welcome and valued. Indeed, in a recent Washington Post poll, 46% of Americans expressed a negative attitude toward Islam. That is a very scary polling result. It is even scarier when we realize the negative number today is seven points higher than it was in the months right after 9/11.

Since 9/11, the number of Americans who believe Islam encourages violence against non-Muslims has more than doubled from 14% to 33%. 25% are willing to go on record as possessing prejudice against Muslims and Arabs. Can we imagine finding 25% of our population who would admit to being prejudiced against, say, African Americans or Jews?

One thing that jumps out in the poll is the totally false association of Islam with terrorists in the Middle East. Perhaps the easiest way to debunk that falsehood is to understand that the world’s four nations with the largest Muslim populations are Indonesia, Pakistan, India and Bangledesh—none of which are in the Arab world. Of the nations with the fourteen largest Muslim populations, only one, Egypt, is in the Middle East.

Every Friday hundreds of Muslims attend midday prayer services downstairs here at Western. Of all the things we do in ministry, making this space available to the Muslim community should be high on the list of things in which we take pride. Watching the people come to prayer, I am always struck that it is like watching the world come to worship. The family systems of the attendees are rooted in different nations and cultures from around the world. Would that Christian congregations looked like that on Sunday morning!

As a nation, we are developing a major anti-Muslim image at the precise moment when Islam is growing. There are more than one billion Muslims in the world; somewhere between six to eight million here in the U.S. To develop a bias toward such an enormous, growing segment of the human family seems almost suicidal on our part.

What can account for our huge upswing in anti-Muslim sentiment? I think the conservative intellectual Francis Fukuyama describes a major part of the problem. In his latest book, he speaks of our nation’s response to the Al Qaeda attack on 9/11 and says, "But conceiving the larger struggle as a global war comparable to the world wars or the Cold War vastly overstates the scope of the problem, suggesting that we are taking on a large part of the Arab and Muslim worlds. Before the Iraq war, we were probably at war with no more than a few thousand people around the world who would consider martyring themselves and causing nihilistic damage to the United States. The scale of the problem has grown because we have unleashed a maelstrom."

No one can accuse Fukuyama of being in the "blame America first" camp. But he is not afraid to admit that we, as a nation, make mistakes, sometimes catastrophic mistakes. It is time that our elected leaders admit that we are currently engaged in a global strategy that is simultaneously fueling anti-Americanism around the world and anti-Muslim sentiment here at home. Our current foreign policy has become a double curse.

There are many reasons why this war in Iraq needs to end. But among the primary reasons it needs to end is what the war is doing to us. Just as Pearl Harbor fueled an ugly bigotry toward Asians and Asian Americans, so this war is fueling an ugly bigotry toward Muslims and Arabs. We can figure out ways to defend ourselves against terrorists. But can we figure out a way to defend ourselves against anti-Islamic bigotry?

Can we practice religious tolerance at home and preach it around the world? Frankly, as I read history, spreading religious tolerance would have a much greater positive effect of humanity than spreading democracy. Over the centuries, there have been lots of different forms of governments, democratic and otherwise, that were reasonably peaceful and just. But there has never been a religiously intolerant society that is peaceful and just.

The Church needs to be a leader when it comes to building religious tolerance, not a contributor to religious intolerance. We must get busy educating ourselves and our children about the positive attributes of Islam. When I was growing up, I was taught the virtues of Judaism in church and at home. I wasn’t taught that Judaism was a lesser religion than Christianity. I was taught that it was Jesus’ religion. It was not just to be respected. It was to be held in high esteem.

The time has come for us to start doing the same with Islam. Actually, the time is long overdue. As Christians, we shouldn’t say another word about Islam until we know something about Islam.

As we have studied Islam in our first Thursday lunchtime discussions with members of Temple Sinai, my already deep respect for Islam has grown. I have always envied the intense prayer discipline of Islam. I have also always been grateful for the way they honor Jesus as one of God’s great prophets.

But my reasons to respect and want to learn more about Islam continue to grow. Like Christians and Jews, Muslims are people of the Book. I want to know more about what the Koran actually says. As in Christianity, there is tremendous diversity within Islam. Our exposure to Iraq has taught us about the differences between Sunnis and Shiites. There are many other subsets within Islam. What are they? We should know. What about the role of women in Islam? How much diversity is there on the subject? The organizational structure of Islam, especially the role of its clergy, remains a mystery to me. Most of us operate on false or misleading generalizations about what Islam is and what Muslims do and believe. Equally bad, we have allowed the actions of a few to create a caricature of the many. Associating Muslims with terrorism and extremism is as outrageous as associating Italians with mobsters, the Irish with the IRA or Colombians with drugs lords. As Christians, do we think our faith is accurately portrayed by the Crusaders, the witch trials in Salem or an anti-abortion assassin?

If we continue to allow our opinion of Islam to be shaped by the most extreme members of that religion, the true nature of Islam will continue to be distorted and anti-Muslim bias will continue to grow. If it does, we doom our children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren to generations of bloody religious battles.

There is time to nip this growing anti-Muslim bias in the bud. And the time is now. Right now.

This is a very scary moment for our nation. However, it is also a moment of great opportunity. We have the chance to write a new chapter of religious tolerance and acceptance in this nation’s history. We can be known as the generation who welcomed Muslims to a prominent position in America.

As Christians in this nation, we do welcome Muslims to this amazing multi-cultural feast called America. May they benefit as we have benefitted.

Let us pray: Gracious God, Jesus taught that you love us all. For this Good News we give thanks. Help us to continue to build what we inherited—the most diverse, eclectic and heterogenous society in history. As we do so, may our respect for and knowledge about other religions and other peoples grow. Amen.

 

John W. Wimberly, Jr.

Pastor, Western Presbyterian Church

2401 Virginia Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20037, USA